By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
"There have been calls for coordinated action, such as protesting at the training ground and/or invading the pitch. They're valid ideas. Here are a few others."
Invading the pitch is not a valid idea. All it will do is get the club in trouble with the FL.
Interesting to see what fans of Middlesbrough, Blackburn, Portsmouth,Hull and Ipswich are saying. Not supporting the selection last night but we are not alone in doing it.
Using Microsoft Edge. I can access the official site but whrn I try to log on I get the following:-
"Your connection isn't private Attackers might be trying to steal your information from login.qpr.co.uk (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). Learn more about this warning net::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID"
Surely every player is insured so any medical has to be accepted by a third party that is the insurance company. So where does this come from that the club is lackadaisical with medicals
I think FA rules state that any new offer must be at least as good as previous contract.
"Any Offer of Re-engagement must be on the same or not less favourable terms as the player’s current contract (including all guaranteed payments, bonuses and benefits in kind – excluding once-only signing-on fees). "
Yes. Hope it does not come back to bite us. It must be a gamble for Charlton to pay £3m plus wages which I assume was more than we offered (where do they get that from after 5 years in league one) so they must see something in him which we have not seen or it is a contract problem. I’d like to think he has told the club that he will not sign a new contract.
Is it the case Kelman will not sign a contract regardless of what we offer. In the first instance cannot see where Charlton have £3M to spend and then pay at least what we are offering in wages.