Norwich City 2 v 1 Southampton
EFL Championship
Saturday, 13th December 2025 Kick-off 12:30

Voting is OPEN. Click here to submit your votes.

Vladan Kovačević	6.7
Kellen Fisher	5.7
Ruairi McConville	5.8
Harry Darling	5.8
Ben Chrisene	5.5
Kenny McLean	6.0
Pelle Mattsson	7.0
Forson Amankwah	6.0
Jacob Wright	6.1
Oscar Schwartau	5.8
Jovon Makama	7.0

José Córdoba	5.7
Emiliano Marcondes	5.8
Errol Mundle-Smith	5.5
Mathias Kvistgaarden	5.2
Tony Springett	5.7

5.2	Gavin Bazunu
4.5	Taylor Harwood-Bellis
4.2	Nathan Wood
4.3	Jack Stephens
3.9	Ryan Fraser
5.4	Flynn Downes
5.3	Caspar Jander
5.7	Ryan Manning
4.9	Finn Azaz
6.7	Leo Scienza
5.1	Adam Armstrong

5.0	Cameron Bragg
4.8	Damascena Santos Welington
4.3	Oriol Romeu
3.8	Cameron Archer
4.7	Jay Robinson

Referee	3.5
Match Rating	4.1

Your Norwich City v Southampton Match Reports

Monksway added 16:09 - Dec 13

Plan A stops working when the players start to tire and don't find space. Passes get slower and more predictable. We need a championship plan B with a big centre forward, crosses into the box and second balls. Saints really can't mix it when the going gets tough.

Alehouse added 17:43 - Dec 13

It's no wonder the midfield and forward players get tired. They have to do all the running around while the 3 centre backs stroll around passing the ball from side to side. And when the ball is played into our box, as for the first goal, 2 of them are marking no-body and 1 is failing to get the right side of the sole attacker. We need full backs who can defend, one less centre-half, and one more midfield player. Then we might be able to dominate games.

Bowlercow added 18:52 - Dec 13

We got our come uppance because we still try to play a short pass game out of defence A couple of times it took 8 or more passes to get out of our own 18 yard box
To combat their high press we needed the odd ball over the top We have pace so use it

Boris1977 added 19:01 - Dec 13

Wake up call. As per the Millwall game we don't have steel - particularly in the back 4.

YosemiteSaint added 19:34 - Dec 13

I think it's fair to say we were a bit unlucky today and should have won the match. But entirely agreed we definitely need a Plan B for second halves especially. Eckert's worked wonders—when we're home and dry by halftime. But recent results suggest he's yet got a steep tactical learning curve. ¶ Meanwhile, poor penalty by Armstrong (he's got to sell it better), two goals via keepers beaten at near posts, and the return of the "hand of God" puts us to the sword.

BroughtonJim added 19:40 - Dec 13

We just simply seem unable to cope with any form of physicality or ntensity from the opposition.
The seasoned bomb squad at the back stomp n shout about but can't cut it when they are stood up to. A great worry for the end of January.!

Bowlercow added 19:41 - Dec 13

We got our come uppance because we still try to play a short pass game out of defence A couple of times it took 8 or more passes to get out of our own 18 yard box
To combat their high press we needed the odd ball over the top We have pace so use it

BroughtonJim added 20:04 - Dec 13

We just simply seem unable to cope with any form of physicality or ntensity from the opposition.
The seasoned bomb squad at the back stomp n shout about but can't cut it when they are stood up to. A great worry for the end of January.!

BroughtonJim added 21:06 - Dec 13

We just simply seem unable to cope with any form of physicality or ntensity from the opposition.
The seasoned bomb squad at the back stomp n shout about but can't cut it when they are stood up to. A great worry for the end of January.!

Block8 added 21:51 - Dec 13

We missed Fellows so much but we desperately need a right back!

janecook added 23:04 - Dec 13

The main problem today was caused by going back to the Russell Martin slow possession play. Once Fellows became unavailable we lost our only forward thinking outlet that side. His replacement Fraser spent all game passing back or across the pitch. The January transfer window cant come quick enough for us to get a new goalkeeper, a right back and a centre half that can win a ball in the air

PezzaSaint added 09:14 - Dec 14

My thoughts entirely AleHouse. Play three centre backs if they deal well with balls in to the box, but ours don’t and by having three there they zonal mark rather than pick up individuals and responsibility is easily passed over! I feel that Norwich’s first goal yesterday may not have happened if Wood had felt the sole responsibility of not letting the forward get to the near post?! And of course you lose a player in midfield when playing with wingbacks and 3 centre backs. Plus of course our play becomes predictable, particularly in the second half when players tire and replacements aren’t as good!

BroughtonJim added 09:48 - Dec 14

We just simply seem unable to cope with any form of physicality or ntensity from the opposition.
The seasoned bomb squad at the back stomp n shout about but can't cut it when they are stood up to. A great worry for the end of January.!

SanMarco added 08:30 - Dec 15

I thought the idea of all this tippy-tappy stuff was that the opposition got tired in the second half not us. Under Tonda we are world beaters first half and relegation candidates second half.

If we are serious about promotion we need to sort the defence out.