By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
He ay not have been good, but as you said, he scored goals inside (and from around) the 6 yard box. He didn't have a bad goals/games ratio either. Those attributes imo are good for a striker and QPR could certainly use one of those in the squad apart from Kone and Burrell.
The naming rights of Loftus Road is worth £1.2m over 3 years. I don't know how much other FL clubs get for their stadium naming rights , but £400k a year doesn't seem a lot to me.
He will be sent back at the end of the German season. What happens after that is anyone's guess, but mine is that QPR will look to get him off the books by offering him a free transfer in the hope that another club will take him.
He has been a disastrous signing and total waste of money.
I agree about the costs, but it seems Rueben is content with spending his money on the club. How else could it be explained that the likes of Nourry and Williams have such vital roles in running this club with so very little experience of football?
If Rueben was concerned surely he would approach people like Wenger, Ferguson Ancelotti etc for advice on suitable people for these jobs.
I think this was more likely. Madsen, because he was clearly a better no.6 or 8, than the 10 he was playing last season. Varane , because it was hoped he would kick on from last season and be sold this summer. Morgan, because he is being developed.
However, Field is also a sellable player and should have been given more playing time.
It wasn't a case of hindsight,but given how this season has been going, it was only a matter of how soon QPR would need Field. Varane was still out recovering when Field was loaned out.
Yeah I thought that too. It was as if he wanted to speak his mind, but fearful of losing his job. Field going out on loan was not his idea.
And when asked about the injuries and whether training had anything to do with them he replied he is the manager (and possibly wanted to add not in charge of the training methods and programmes).
I thought Saito was far better in his defensive duties last season and even covered admirably at left back. To me this suggests that it is more a coaching problem. That's on Bould or Stephan rather than Saito.
I commented and even emailed the club before the end of last season that the kits should honour the 75/76 season, but the pink and black monstrosity does not do that.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
