Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum
Reply
Burrell Scores
at 15:58 1 Oct 2026

There's a lad with some big hair scoring for them at the moment, maybe he'll make it.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 15:17 1 Oct 2026

Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 15:13 1 Oct 2026

It's going to get super ugly.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 13:50 1 Oct 2026

I for one am stunned that the United Arab Emirates didn't want to buy Manchester City purely for the love of the game.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 09:07 1 Oct 2026

It's a bit of an eye opener all these CityNews, CityCentral etc social media accounts when you click on them and look at their location...
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 08:39 1 Oct 2026

Believe me, if I was in charge of the Man Utd shirt sponsorship it would say something very different.
Forum
Reply
Development Squad
at 07:27 1 Oct 2026

The way things are going you'll be starting up front, in which case it's the main entrance on South Africa Road.
Forum
Reply
Burrell Scores
at 07:24 1 Oct 2026

It does, although how many non-parachute payment clubs at our level can afford to carry a squad of 30 first teamers? We can't for a start.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 07:22 1 Oct 2026

The context of the Cantona goal and the Ashley Young penalty farce is important here.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 19:00 30 Sep 2026

Well he put his name on the shirt yes but the deal had to be commensurate with other Championship shirt sponsorships.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 18:40 30 Sep 2026

There's another point I've seen made today that let's say QPR get to the Premier League, and let's say I as a fan want to give them £50m to put Loftforwords.co.uk as the front shirt sponsor (Patreon's had a good month). I'm not allowed to do it, because it's not "fair market rate". But if I want to give Man Utd £50m to put it on their shirt, that would be fine.
Forum
Reply
Burrell Scores
at 17:02 30 Sep 2026

We'd already had a week where Lamptey, Dunne, Kone, Chair and Smyth had all failed to last the first half of games (Dunne managed one minute after half time). I did say at the time I'd probably have gone for a downplay and "let's see how we do over the course of the season" than describing it as "sensational" and namechecking the whole performance department.

Where I do agree with him is that the schedule players have been put through to start this season is nutty and was always likely to lead to this. Millwall have got 13 out, Norwich are missing 12 including four picked up this break. Problem is this has been happening to us for three seasons now.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 16:17 30 Sep 2026

He's just being a contrary fcker as usual.
If they'd found them not guilty he'd probably have come out as a whistleblower.
I remember this time last year when he was asked whether he'd manage them if they were relegated down the leagues and he said it would make him "more likely to stay" rather than less.
Walked that walk didn't he?
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 16:03 30 Sep 2026



"Pep" wants the City fans to know he's "here, more than ever".
Which is pretty apt really, being completely untrue and easy to prove as such.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 11:31 30 Sep 2026

I've long said this about the total absence of players failing drug tests - it would damage the product.

In a world where there are drug cheats in golf, shooting, archery etc the idea that everybody is clean in an increasingly athletic and endurance-based sport like football is nuts. And yet apart from the odd dopey young lad with cocaine, nobody ever fails the tests. Because if they did, it would become like cycling, or Olympic sprinting, where every time somebody goes faster than ever before (or scores more goals) many people would just shrug and assume they're doped up to the eyeballs.

It's not a good product to sell to the public if the first assumption is it's all rigged/cheating.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 11:09 30 Sep 2026

Sadly I think it's only going to increase the protectionism at the very top i.e. Man Utd, Liverpool and to a certain extent Arsenal. The clubs that get screwed on these things are the ones who try and challenge - City, Forest, Villa, even our good selves.
Forum
Reply
Portsmouth to Blackburn (via Hibs) – Awaydays
at 22:10 29 Sep 2026

I did wonder when they were talking about burning down my flat whether somebody should have pointed this out to them.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 19:46 29 Sep 2026

I feel for the City fans that followed them all the way to the Second Division and sold it out v Macclesfield and things like that. They didn’t ask for it to become a Middle Eastern play thing and in my experience some of them felt v uncomfortable with it and some walked away entirely.
But the people whose kids are suddenly charging round Tooting Common in City shirts can get to fck.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 18:46 29 Sep 2026

The story Birmingham are telling, for instance, has never added up to me. Again, a new and rich owner pumping money in claiming absolutely ridiculous levels of revenue to justify it. They've had one limited series doc appear on Amazon Prime, otherwise they're the same shtshow Championship club they've always been.

Wrexham - you can see it. Multiple Disney series, United Airlines sponsorships, US tours etc etc. Birmingham I've been wondering about for a while.
Forum
Reply
Man City - GUILTY
at 18:29 29 Sep 2026

Yeh. They didn't even say that about Paladini in the Faurlin case, who claimed to have a found a letter saying the whole thing was fine after all in the drawer of his desk about 20 minutes before the hearing.
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

Northernr


Site Scores

Prediction League: 0
TOTAL: 0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026